<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Happened to Advertising? A Look Back.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hyperhead.com/what-happened-to-advertising-a-look-back/424/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hyperhead.com/what-happened-to-advertising-a-look-back/424/</link>
	<description>All hyper in the head...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 04:46:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hyperhead</title>
		<link>http://hyperhead.com/what-happened-to-advertising-a-look-back/424/comment-page-1/#comment-1173</link>
		<dc:creator>hyperhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperhead.com/?p=424#comment-1173</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;10 years ago today,&lt;/b&gt; this post appeared on my website and as a magazine article. 

This was my first blog post (though I didn&#039;t realize it at the time). 

The version posted here has been edited, but I wanted to celebrate and mark this 10-year anniversary. 

A whole closing section about why video email advertising is the future was removed... I was pimping for a company selling those services at the time I wrote this; so I had to wrap their angle into the piece... plus, that was before email had lost its battle with the spammers.

But nonetheless... what do you think? Does this read as bland and obvious now (10 years down the pike), or do you think it&#039;s worthy of an Anniversary Post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>10 years ago today,</b> this post appeared on my website and as a magazine article. </p>
<p>This was my first blog post (though I didn&#8217;t realize it at the time). </p>
<p>The version posted here has been edited, but I wanted to celebrate and mark this 10-year anniversary. </p>
<p>A whole closing section about why video email advertising is the future was removed&#8230; I was pimping for a company selling those services at the time I wrote this; so I had to wrap their angle into the piece&#8230; plus, that was before email had lost its battle with the spammers.</p>
<p>But nonetheless&#8230; what do you think? Does this read as bland and obvious now (10 years down the pike), or do you think it&#8217;s worthy of an Anniversary Post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

